Dictionary of Meaning

<<Back
Please select a letter:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0-9

Free Trade

*** Shopping-Tip: Free Trade
{{confusing}} '''Free trade''' is the unhindered flow of goods and services between countries, and is a name given to economic policies and parties supporting increases in such trade. Free trade is a concept in economics and government that refers to: :* International trade of good (accounting) goods without tariffs (taxes on imports) or other trade barrier trade barriers (''e.g.,'' quotas on imports) :* International trade in services without tariffs or other trade barriers :* The free movement of Labour (economics) labor between countries :* The free movement of Capital (economics) capital between countries :* The absence of trade-distorting policies (such as tax taxes, subsidies, regulations or laws) that give domestic firms, households or factors of production an advantage over foreign ones. :* Government protection of property rights to enforce the above conditions __TOC__ The relative social cost costs, benefits and beneficiaries of free trade are debated by academics, economists, governments and interest groups. Aspects of the ongoing debate are addressed below. ; Wider meaning of â€œfree tradeâ€? Depending on the specific context, use of the term ''free trade'' can signify one or more of the above conditions. However, it is fundamental that only ''governments'' can restrict trade: they have the legal monopoly over the use of physical force in a geographical area. The term ''free trade'' has become very politically based, and it is not uncommon for so-called "free trade agreements" to impose additional trade restrictions. Such restrictions on trade are often due to domestic political pressure by powerful corporate, environmental movement environmental or labor movement labor interest groups seeking special protections of their perceived interests. Free trade agreements are a key element of customs unions and free trade areas. The details and differences of these agreements are covered in their respective articles.

History of free trade
The history of free trade is a history of international trade focusing on the developments of open markets. It is known that various prosperous world cultures throughout history have engaged in trade. Based on this, theoretical rationalizations as to why a policy of free trade would be beneficial to nations developed over time. These theories were developed in its academic modern sense from the commercial culture of England, and more broadly Europe, in the past five centuries. In opposition to free trade, a policy of mercantilism was developed in Europe in the 1500s and persists in various form to this day. Early free trade theorists who were opposed to mercantilism were David Ricardo and Adam Smith. Free trade theorists offered trade as the reason why certain cultures prospered economically. Adam Smith, for example, pointed to increased trading as being the reason for the flourishing of not just Mediterranean cultures such as Egypt, Greece, and Rome, but also of Bengal (East Indies) and China. Free trade policies have battled with mercantilism mercantilist, protectionism protectionist, isolationism isolationist, communism communist, and other policies over the centuries. Wars, such as the Opium Wars, have been fought primarily over trade. All developed countries have used protectionism, but usually reduced it as they gained more wealth. Some critics say that having more wealth guarantees that the country would benefit from free trade, although the majority of scientists think that also poor countries would benefit from free trade. The most notable critic, the economist Dani Rodrik claims, "the only systematic relationship [between tariffs and economic growth] is that countries dismantle trade restrictions as they get richer." {{ref|Rodrik}} From the 1700s to the mid-1800s, Britain used industrial policies similar to those later used by Japan and South Korea. Once Britain had secured economic leadership, they began to support free trade. Criticising the British position, American President Ulysses S. Grant retorted that "within 200 years, when America has gotten out of protection all that it can offer, it too will adopt free trade". {{ref|Grant}} However, it is important to note that a lot Britain's wealth during the protectionist period came from indentured labor and colonialism.

Intellectual property and free trade
Historically, the free trade movement was skeptical and even hostile to the notion of intellectual property, regarding it as Monopoly monopolistic and harmful to a free, competitive economy. Indeed, during the late 19th century, free trade advocates succeeded in reducing the length of the patents available in many European countries. The Netherlands even abolished its patent system (albeit temporarily). The 19th century anti-patent cause failed largely because the recession of 1874 weakened the free trade movement of the time {{ref|Machlup1950}} (and also because patent advocates used a public relations campaign which was remarkably sophisticated for its time). It is thus remarkable (some would even say ironic) that corporations lobbying for expanded intellectual property rights have succeeded in including TRIPS, a very strong treaty on intellectual property rights, as a membership requirement for the World Trade Organization, the international organization dedicated to furthering the cause of free trade.

Free trade controversy
:''Main article: Free trade controversy. Different arguments are used by those who favour and those who oppose free trade. These arguments can be divided in economic, moral and sociopolitical arguments. The major controversy about free trade arises from the fact that the primary discussions have little to do with freedom or trade, but rather who gets to control who wins and who loses. Thus, rather than being an objective discussion about how to make trade truly free, the discussion devolves into a political war of words with each government entity, non governmental organization and special interest group trying to get the upper hand. Some people believe the term free trade is a prejudicial term and so its use is increasingly discouraged. 'Free' is a strong, effective word. The evidence is all around: all the shopping centres; example: 'buy one, get one free.' Simple, yet effective enough to be popular with retailers - behaviour and opinion changing, a strong word. 'Free Trade' of course, is the favoured term of those who advocate '''unregulated trade''' or '''deregulated trade''' and prefer the term 'Free Trade' in the same way retailers offer, 'buy one, get one '''free''''

Alternatives to free trade

Tobin Tax
:''Main article: Tobin Tax. A Tobin tax is the suggested tax on all trade of currency across borders. This is supposed to put a penalty on short-term speculation in currencies.

Fair trade
:''Main article: Fair trade. The fair trade movement, also known as the trade justice movement, promotes international labor, environment and social standards for the production of traded goods and services. The movement focuses in particular on exports from the Third and Second Worlds to the First World.

Balanced trade
:''Main article: Balanced Trade. Balanced trade is an alternative economic model to free trade. Under balanced trade, nations are required to provide a fairly even reciprocal trade pattern; they cannot run large trade deficits. If deficits appear, the surplus nation must find a way to balance out trade or risk sanctions, fees, or quotas. Critics say this may discourage innovation as one country may reduce its efforts to produce products needed by the other.

International barter
Some nations have prohibited trade under monetary terms of trade. For example, Hjalmar Schacht arranged barter for Nazi Germany to bypass the free market which he thought was rigged by Anglo-American capitalists. {{ref|Schacht}} The former Soviet Union occasionally arranged bilateral barter within its sphere of influence. See Comprehensive Program for Socialist Economic Integration or Comecon. Arab League nations have also occasionally replaced monetary trade with barter.

Increase the credit risk to international loans
George Soros and others argue that some of the most destructive free trade, such as developing world agricultural monoculture, is driven by export-oriented production targets set by the International Monetary Fund(IMF) and the governments it supports. He suggests that the volume of this trade would be lower if the lending banks were liable for credit default instead of receiving IMF bail-outs. If banks were responsible for default, the levels of lending would be lower and lead to more sustainable export programs due to the discipline of the free market, he believes.

International price floors
Some argue that free trade is responsible for the decline in international commodity prices. One reason for these low prices is the over-production of subsidized commodities in the developed world. Rather than removing the production subsidy for farmers in the rich world some suggest extending them to farmers in the developing world. For instance, producers in Poland lobbied to be included in the Common Agriculture Policy. The reason that rich-country farmers need subsidies to thrive is the comparative advantage of cheap land and labour enjoyed by their poor-country competitors.

Separating world prices from domestic prices
Foreign trade of Communist Czechoslovakia was conducted at "free trade" import prices, with the Ministry of Foreign Trade selling the goods on, into the internal market, at pre-determined prices for each good. In this way, Czechoslovakian consumers were insulated from shifts in world prices whilst having some access to foreign products. It is difficult for governments to sustain different internal prices over the long term. If the internal price is set below world prices, smuggling smugglers try to profit from the differential by illegally exporting the product to nations where they can sell it at a higher price. To the extent smugglers succeed, the domestic government is indirectly subsidizing foreign consumers. This problem has been vividly illustrated in nations where fuel prices are subsidized below world prices; domestic shortages frequently occur as a significant portion of the good is illegally smuggled out of the country. Rationing and black markets are stimulated by artificially low prices; in Iraq the famously long petrol pump queues for [http://www.cidi.org/humanitarian/hsr/iraq/ixl130.html petrol at 50 dinars/litre] can be bypassed by buying on the black market at 250 dinars/litre. Unofficial markets are a common problem wherever the "official" price is below (or above) the free trade price. {{ref|Economist}} Despite the difficulties of maintaining fixed commodity prices many Governments that attempt it claim that doing so "immunizes" their economies against destabilizing price shocks. It is sometimes argued that the social and economic benefits ''alone'', outweigh the disadvantages (of import-price stability). On the other hand, international prices tell the costs of producing certain products and the benefits of consuming them. By separating the prices this flow of information is halted and therefore the local decisions are decoupled from the global needs and possibilities, thus hindering the producers in the country to produce the products where they have a comparative advantage and the consumers to consume the products that can elsewhere be produced so cheaply that they would like to consume them at those prices instead of consuming some other kind of products or less products (or services).

Regional trading blocs
James Goldsmith advocated free trade within regional trade bloc trading blocs, but not between blocs (such as EC countries). If countries within the "customs union" had similar living standards and norms of social and environmental policy they would not race to the bottom. He also proposed protectionism in the goods market, whilst allowing free trade in technology and capital.

See also
*free trade area *free trade zone *international trade *trade barrier *trade war *trade war over genetically modified food *offshore outsourcing *offshoring *list of international trade topics *Balanced trade *NAFTA *GATT *List of Free Trade Agreements *List of Trade blocs *Trade bloc *Globalization and health

Footnotes
# {{note|Rodrik}}See page 22 of [http://www.undp.org/poverty/docs/pov_globalgovernancetrade_pub.pdf â€œThe Global Governance of Trade As If Development Really Mattered.â€?] # {{note|Grant}}See [http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/globalizationmyths.pdf â€œGlobalization and the Myth of Free Trade.â€?] # {{note|Machlup1950}} Fritz Machlup & Edith Penrose, "The Patent Controversy in the 19th Century", ''Journal of Economic History,'' 10 (1) pp. 1-29, 1950. #{{note|Cobden1838}} Emphasis added to Cobden's quotation of the petition, in a free-trade speech delivered in 1846, the full text of which is available at [http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/cobdenonfreetrade.html â€œFree Trade With All Nations.â€?] # See [http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/downloads/economicFreedomandPerCapita.gif â€œEconomic Freedom and Per Capita Income.â€?] # {{note|Trap103}} Quotation from page 103 of James Goldsmith's ''The Trap'', 1994, Macmillan ISBN 0333642244 (summarized in [http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/pen-l/1995m05/msg00266.htm Art Hilgart' review]). James Goldsmith Goldsmith had a background in corporate takeovers, but breaking up conglomerates within nations would still be permissible in his model, so long as no part of the conglomerate exported outside its area of production. His concern for the harm done to rural societies by the effects of free trade is summarized on page 103 with the sentence: "The cost of such social breakdown can never be measured. The damage is too fundamental." # {{note|Schacht}} Officially, the 1933 bilateral-barter policy was designed to ensure that foreign countries bought as much from industrial Germany as she bought from them. However, Milton Friedman has argued ([http://www.freetochoose.net/lecture1n.html]) that Hjalmar Schacht's exchange controls were primarily designed to restrict capital flight. # {{note|Economist}} See ''The Economist''â€™s review of fuel subsidy's effects [http://www.economist.com/World/africa/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3502385 The Economist online]. #{{note|Murray}}In â€œ[http://www.libertyhaven.com/regulationandpropertyrights/tradeandinternationaleconomics/tradeunderattack.shtml Free Trade Under Attack: What America Can Do],â€? Professor Murray Weidenbaum argued that â€œTight-knit special interests are manipulating the political system for greater protectionism, while the more diffused citizen interest suffers.â€? This article (from 1984) echoes the claim of earlier trade theorists (back to Adam Smith) that protectionism is largely a result of a political failure, but comes from a former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to U.S. President Reagan President Ronald Reagan, who witnessed the process in 1980s government, and wrote: â€œ[P]leas for protectionism reflect the ability of relatively small but influential groups to convince legislatures to adopt policies that benefit them, albeit at the expense of citizens at large. The balance of power is extremely uneven, given the limited knowledge that consumers currently have about these matters.â€? This call for free trade argues that the consumer interest is divided, but assumes that the public would be homogeneously in favour of free trade if better educated; this is controversial and not all consumers currently support free trade.

External links

In favor of free trade

- Global Growth Org (London)
- Globalisation Institute
- Arguments for Free Trade from the Mises Institute
- Lewrockwell.com
- The Cato Institute's Free Trade website
- Techcentralstation.com
- The Heritage Foundation
- The Future of Freedom Foundation
- The Heartland Institute
- The Foundation for Economic Education
- The American Enterprise Institute
- The Timbro Institute (Sweden)
- Border Trade Alliance
- Free Trade Area of the Americas
- European Free Trade Association
- NAFTA Website
- Australia-USA Free Trade Agreement
- Central European Free Trade Agreement
- Free Trade Party
- The Free Trade League
- Globalization and Health
- Friedman Foundation

Opposed to free trade

- Reclaim Democracy - Global Corporatization
- David Orchard Campaign for Canada
- Friends of the Earth International - Trade Environment & Sustainability Campaign
- The Third World Network
- Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
- The Council of Canadians
- Our World is Not For Sale Network
- New Democratic Party of Canada
- International Institute for Sustainable Development
- Public Citizen - Global Trade Watch (USA)
- World Development Movement (UK)
- Trade Justice Movement (UK)
- International Society for Ecology and Culture (UK)
- Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives - Trade Project
- Oxfam - Free trade
- FoodFirst.org 12 myths about hunger - Myth 8: Free trade is the answer *United States Reform Party *Ross Perot
- Pat Buchanan
- AFL-CIO (USA) *Ralph Nader
- US Green Party
- Gone With The World - Arguments against excess free-trade
- David Korten's "When Corporations Rule the World".

Articles and papers

- In Defence of Globalization, Free Trade and Free Market
- Stop Calling It “Free Trade!”
- BBC News - The argument for free trade
- Guardian Unlimited - Food & Trade - Hunger in a world of plenty
- ''Free Trade as Ideology'', by Edward Luttwak, August 1, 2001
- Why developing countries should liberalise trade
- Freedom to Work, to Earn, & to Buy by Harry Browne Category:International trade Category:Economic ideologies de:Freihandel es:Libre comercio fr:Libre-Ã©change gl:Libre Comercio id:Perdagangan bebas it:Liberismo ka:áƒ—áƒ?áƒ•áƒ˜áƒ¡áƒ£áƒ¤áƒ?áƒšáƒ˜ áƒ•áƒ?áƒáƒ áƒ?áƒ‘áƒ? mk:Ð¡Ð»Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð° Ñ‚Ñ€Ð³Ð¾Ð²Ð¸Ñ˜Ð° fi:Vapaakauppa sv:Frihandel th:à¸?à¸²à¸£à¸„à¹‰à¸²à¹€à¸ªà¸£à¸µ zh:è‡ªç”±è²¿æ˜“ see Free trade

*** Shopping-Tip: Free Trade