Dictionary of Meaning
<<Back
Please select a letter:
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
0-9
Click here for Shopping
Libertarian Socialism
*** Shopping-Tip: Libertarian Socialism
{{socialism}}
'''Libertarian socialism''' is any one of a group of
politics political philosophy philosophies dedicated to opposing coercive forms of
authority and
social hierarchy, in particular the institutions of
capitalism and the
State. Some of the best known libertarian socialist
Ideology ideologies are
anarchism - particularly
anarchist communism and
anarcho-syndicalism - as well as
mutualism (economic theory) mutualism,
council communism,
autonomist Marxism, and
social ecology. However, the terms
Anarchist communism anarcho-communism and libertarian communism should not be considered synonyms for libertarian socialism.
Anarchist communism Anarcho-communism is a particular branch of libertarian socialism.
Libertarian socialists believe in the abolition of the
State and of
property (ownership right) private control over the
means of production, considering both to be unnecessary and harmful institutions. Most libertarian socialists support personal property or ''use rights'' over certain goods destined for individual use, however there are exceptions. The most notable of these are the anarcho-communists, who wish to abolish not only private property over the means of production but individual ownership in the products of labor as well.
Overview
The basic philosophy of libertarian socialism is summed up in the name: management of the common good (
socialism) in a manner that attempts to maximize the
liberty of
individuals and minimizes concentration of power or authority (libertarianism). It attempts to achieve this through the decentralization of political and economic power, usually involving the collectivization of most large-scale property and enterprise. Libertarian socialism denies the legitimacy of most forms of economically significant private property, since, according to socialists, when private property becomes capital, it leads to the exploitation of others with less economic means and thus infringes on the exploited class's individual freedoms.
Anti-capitalism
{{See also|Anti-capitalism}}
Libertarian socialists differentiate between the idea of authority based on power, and authority based on
knowledge or
skills. The term "power", in this instance, refers to the social or physical dominance of one individual over another. They oppose all unjustified authority, be it
political power political,
economic power economic, or social.
Libertarian socialists believe that all social bonds should be developed by
individuals who have an equal amount of
Negotiation bargaining power, that an accumulation of economic power in the hands of a few and the centralization of political power both reduce the bargaining power—and thus the liberty of the other individuals in society. To put it another way, capitalist (and
libertarianism right-libertarian) principles lead to the concentration of economic power in the hands of those who end up owning the most capital. Libertarian socialism aims to distribute power, and thus freedom, more equally amongst members of society. A key difference between libertarian socialism and right-wing libertarianism is that advocates of the former generally believe that one's degree of freedom is affected by one's economic and social status, whereas advocates of the latter believe that freedom is essentially freedom of choice, or freedom of action. They would argue that even a poor, low-status individual is entirely free in a libertarian society in the sense that he has complete freedom to do whatever he chooses with those possessions and resources which he has. Some analyze the difference between libertarian socialism and right-wing libertarianism using the concepts of
positive liberty and
negative liberty. It is argued that libertarian socialism is said to promote positive liberty at the expense of negative liberty, whereas right-wing libertarianism is said to do the opposite.
Libertarian socialists believe if freedom is valued, then society must work towards a system in which individuals have the power to decide economic issues along with political issues. Libertarian socialists seek to replace unjustified authority with
direct democracy and voluntary
federation in all aspects of life, including physical
Community communities and economic
Business enterprises.
Like other
socialists, libertarian socialists believe that objects should be held communally and controlled democratically; the only exception being
personal possessions. Whereas "private property" grants an individual exclusive control over a thing whether it is in use or not, "possession" grants no rights to things that are not in use. A property title grants owners the right to withhold his property from others, or, if he desires, to require payment from those who wish to use it. "Possession," on the other hand, is not compatible with this form of "exploitation" or "extortion". Possession amounts to the right to '''use''', rather than '''own''', for oneself.
For this reason it is accurate to say that libertarian socialists favor the
labor theory of value over the
subjective theory of value. This means that, to an anarchist, objects have a value associated with them based upon the amount of labor put in to them. As such, the only way profit can be produced is by paying workers less than this value or by charging consumers more than this value. Capitalists, on the other hand, believe that an object's value is determined by supply and demand. Despite this preference, not all libertarian socialists would argue that the labor theory is any more concrete than the subjective theory, simply that it is more fair.
Opposition to the State
{{See also|Anti-statism}}
{{anarchism}}
Proponents are most famous for opposing the existence of states or
government. Indeed, in the past many refused to defend themselves in
court because they did not wish to participate in coercive state institutions, instead choosing to go to jail or die.
The critique of states is built on the same principle opposing concentration of authority based on power, which in the libertarian socialist thought constitutes a form of oppression.
In lieu of states, libertarian socialists seek to organize themselves into voluntary institutions (usually called
collectives or
Syndicalism syndicates) which use
direct democracy or
consensus for their decision-making process. Some libertarian socialists advocate combining these institutions using rotating, recallable
Wiktionary:Delegate delegates to higher-level
federations. Others, however, have advanced strong critiques of federated systems, and these federations have rarely been carried out in practice.
Spanish anarchism is a major example of such federations in practice. Contemporary examples of libertarian socialist organizational and decision-making models in practice include the
Zapatista Army of National Liberation Zapatista Councils of Good Government and the Global
Indymedia network (which covers 45 countries on 6 continents). There are also thousands of
indigenous peoples indigenous societies around the world whose political and economic systems can be accurately described as
anarchism anarchist or libertarian socialist, each of which is unique and uniquely suited to the culture that birthed it. For libertarians, that diversity of practice within a framework of common principles is proof of the vitality of those principles and of their flexibility and strength.
Contrary to popular opinion, libertarian socialism has not traditionally been a
utopian movement, tending to avoid dense
Theory theoretical analysis or prediction of what a future society would or should look like. The tradition instead has been that such decisions cannot be made now, and must be made through struggle and experimentation, so that the best solution can be arrived at democratically and organically, and to base the direction for struggle on established historical example.
Supporters often suggest that this focus on exploration over predetermination is one of their great strengths. They point out that the success of science at explaining the natural world comes from its
Scientific method methods and its adherence to open
Rationality rational exploration, not its conclusions; whereas traditional
dogmatic explanations of naturalistic
Phenomenon phenomena have proved almost useless at explaining anything in the natural world.
Although critics claim that they are avoiding questions they cannot answer, libertarian socialists believe that a methodological approach to exploration is the best way to achieve their social goals. To them, dogmatic approaches to social organization are just as doomed to failure as are non-scientific explanations of natural phenomena. Noted anarchist
Rudolf Rocker once stated, "I am an anarchist not because I believe anarchism is the final goal, but because there is no such thing as a final goal" (''The London Years'', 1956).
Because libertarian socialism encourages exploration and embraces a diversity of ideas rather than forming a compact movement, there have arisen inevitable controversies over individuals who describe themselves as libertarian socialists but disagree with some of the core principles of libertarian socialism. For example, Peter Hain interprets libertarian socialism as favoring radical decentralization of power without going as far as the complete abolition of the state [http://www.chartist.org.uk/articles/britpol/july_hain.html], and libertarian socialist
Noam Chomsky supports state intervention to remedy what he regards to be social injustices despite his critiques of the state.
Political roots
As
Albert Meltzer and
Stuart Christie stated in their book ''
The Floodgates of Anarchy'', anarchism has:
:''...its particular inheritance, part of which it shares with socialism, giving it a family resemblance to certain of its enemies. Another part of its inheritance it shares with
liberalism, making it, at birth,
kissing-cousins with American-type
radical individualism, a large part of which has married out of the family into the
Right Wing and is no longer on speaking terms.'' (''The Floodgates of Anarchy'', 1970, page 39.)
That is, anarchism arose as a cross between socialism and liberalism, incorporating the anti-capitalist attitude of '''socialists''' and the anti-statist, what would today be called '''libertarian''', attitude of liberalism.
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, who is often considered the father of modern anarchism, coined the phrase "
Property is theft!" to describe his affinity for the labor theory of value, a socialist value. At the same time he believed that goods should be traded in a free market (one not under constraint of government) where money was replaced with
labor notes which held value in terms of labor rather than supply and demand. A free market is a liberal value.
Seventeen years (1857) after Proudhon first called himself an anarchist (1850), anarchist communist
Joseph Déjacque was the first person to describe himself as a libertarian [http://thenonist.com/index.php/weblog/permalink/2848/]. Because the word libertarian is now commonly used by anti-state capitalists, non-authoritarian socialists often call themselves libertarian socialists to differentiate themselves.
For these reasons libertarian socialism is synonymous with anarchism. However, libertarian socialism has developed a more political connotation while anarchism has grown into a much wider and more philosophical set of ideas. Since mainstream circles equate anarchism with opposition to the state, an ideology known as
anarcho-capitalism has come about which would not fall under the category of libertarian socialism. The phrase has therefore taken on a more leftist tone. In addition, some prefer the name because anarchy is often equated with chaos and can be a confusing word to use in political theory.
Perhaps specifically because libertarian socialism has its roots in both liberalism and socialism, it is often in conflict with liberalism (especially
neoliberalism) and socialism simultaneously.
Conflict with Marxism
{{main|Anarchism and Marxism}}
In rejecting property and the state, libertarian socialists put themselves in opposition to both
capitalist democracy and to authoritarian forms of
Marxism, after the
Anarchism and Marxism anarchist schism from Marxism. Although anarchists and Marxists are often said to share a belief in the ultimate goal of a stateless society, anarchists criticise most Marxists for advocating a transitional phase under which the state is used to achieve this aim. Nonetheless, libertarian Marxist tendencies such as
autonomist Marxism and
council communism have historically been intertwined with the anarchist movement. Anarchist movements have come into conflict with both capitalist and Marxist forces, sometimes at the same time, as in the
Spanish Civil War, though as in that war Marxists themselves are often divided in support or opposition to anarchism. Other political persecutions under
Bureaucracy bureaucratic parties have resulted in a strong historical antagonism between anarchists and libertarian Marxists on the one hand and
Leninism Leninist Marxists on the other and their derivatives such as
Maoism Maoists. In recent history, however, libertarian socialists have repeatedly formed temporary alliances with Marxist-Leninist groups for the purposes of protest against institutions they both reject.
Image:Bakuninfull.jpg Bakunin thumb|left|[[Bakunin|Mikhail Bakunin 1814-1876.html" title="Meaning of Mikhail_Bakunin 1814-1876.html" title="Meaning of thumb|left|[[Bakunin|Mikhail Bakunin 1814-1876">thumb|left|[[Bakunin|Mikhail Bakunin 1814-1876">Mikhail_Bakunin 1814-1876.html" title="Meaning of thumb|left|[[Bakunin|Mikhail Bakunin 1814-1876">thumb|left|[[Bakunin|Mikhail Bakunin 1814-1876
Part of this antagonism can be traced to the
International Workingmen's Association, the ''First International'', a congress of
Radicalism (historical) radical workers, where
Mikhail Bakunin, who was fairly representative of the ''libertarian socialist'' view, and
Karl Marx, whom anarchists accused of being an ''authoritarian'', came into conflict on various issues. Bakunin's viewpoint on the illegitimacy of the State as an institution and the role of electoral politics was starkly counterposed to Marx's views in the First International. Marx and Bakunin's disputes eventually led to Marx taking control of the First International and expelling Bakunin and his followers from the organization. This was the beginning of a long-running feud and schism between libertarian socialists and what they call "authoritarian communists", or alternatively termed just "authoritarians". Of course, some have equally criticised Bakunin for running an
invisible dictatorship, and of being just as ''authoritarian'' as Marx. Indeed, The
Russia Russian Menshevik Fedor Dan criticised
Bolshevism for being a product of Bakuninism.
Some Marxists have formulated views that closely resemble
syndicalism, and thus express more affinity with anarchist ideas. The American Marxist leader
Daniel De Leon, for example, who joined and reorganized the
Socialist Labor Party (USA) Socialist Labor Party in 1890, advocated a form of "industrial unionism" (known as
De Leonism), which was similar to syndicalism, although De Leon himself made a point of distinguishing between the two ideologies. De Leon's insistence on a revolutionary political party working as the political wing of the industrial unions, however, sets him outside of the libertarian socialist current of anarchism (see opposition to the state above).
Several libertarian socialists, notably
Noam Chomsky, believe that anarchism shares much in common with certain variants of Marxism such as the
council communism of
left-wing Marxist
Anton Pannekoek. In Chomsky's ''
Notes on Anarchism'', he suggests the possibility "that some form of council communism is the natural form of
revolutionary socialism in an
industrialization industrial society. It reflects the belief that democracy is severely limited when the industrial system is controlled by any form of autocratic elite, whether of owners, managers, and technocrats, a '
Vanguard party vanguard' party, or a State bureaucracy."
Autonomist Marxism and
situationism are also regarded as being
anti-authoritarian variants of Marxism that are firmly within the libertarian socialist tradition.
Libertarian socialist tendencies
Libertarian socialism is composed of a diverse range of tendencies and organizations, with varying degrees of unity depending on specific ideological beliefs. These are only a few of the most historically important factions within libertarian socialism.
Anarchist communism
Image:ErricoMalatesta.gif thumb|right|Errico Malatesta, 1891
Anarchist communism was first formulated in the
Italy Italian section of the
First International, by
Carlo Cafiero,
Errico Malatesta,
Andrea Costa, and other ex-
Giuseppe Mazzini Mazzinian Republicanism republicans. Out of respect for
Mikhail Bakunin, they did not make their differences from standard
anarchism explicit until after the latter's death. In 1876, at the Florence Conference of the Italian Federation of the International (which was actually held in a forest outside
Florence, due to
police activity), they declared the principles of anarcho-communism, beginning with:
:"The Italian Federation considers the collective property of the products of labour as the necessary complement to the collectivist programme, the aid of all for the satisfaction of the needs of each being the only rule of production and consumption which corresponds to the principle of solidarity. The federal congress at Florence has eloquently demonstrated the opinion of the Italian International on this point..."
The above report was actually made in an article by Malatesta and Cafiero in the (Swiss)
Jura federation's bulletin later that year. Cafiero notes, in ''Anarchie et Communisme'', that private property in the product of labor will lead to unequal accumulation of capital, and therefore undesirable class distinctions.
Anarcho-communists hold that the only road to true liberation of the individual, as well as the abolition of
wage slavery and the State, is the complete abolition of
market systems; whereas some other anarchists and libertarian socialists advocate collective ownership with market elements and sometimes
barter. Anarcho-communists believe the only true liberation comes with a
gift economy operated by the collective under
direct democracy. As such anarcho-communism is the most
left-wing branch of libertarian socialism.
In anarchist communism,
profit no longer exists. Not only that, but
Good (accounting) goods are given away as
gifts in the certainty that others will also give
Product (business) products back. In an industrial setting, this would occur between worker syndicates as well as between individuals. If one syndicate does not share their products, they will not receive resources from other syndicates, making it in their best interest to share.
Anarcho-syndicalism
{{Main|Anarcho-syndicalism}}
Image:Flag of Anarcho syndicalism.svg 200px|left|thumb|Flag used by Anarcho-syndicalists.
'''Anarcho-syndicalism''' is a branch of
anarchism which focuses on the
labor union labor movement. Anarcho-syndicalists view
labor unions as a potential force for
revolutionary social change, replacing
capitalism and the
State with a new society democratically self-managed by workers.
The basic principles of anarcho-syndicalism are:
:#workers'
Wiktionary:Solidarity solidarity
:#
direct action
:#
workers' self-management
Workers' solidarity means that anarcho-syndicalists believe all workers—no matter their
race,
gender, or
ethnic group—are in a similar situation in regard to their
Wiktionary:Boss boss' (
class consciousness). Furthermore, it means that, within
capitalism, any gains or losses made by some workers from or to bosses will eventually affect all workers. Therefore, to
Wiktionary:Liberate liberate themselves, all workers must support one another in their
class conflict.
Anarcho-syndicalists believe that only
direct action—that is, action concentrated on directly attaining a goal, as opposed to indirect action, such as electing a representative to a government position—will allow workers to liberate themselves.
Moreover, anarcho-syndicalists believe that workers' organizations (the organizations that struggle against the wage system, which, in anarcho-syndicalist theory, will eventually form the basis of a new society) should be self-managing. They should not have bosses or “business agents”; rather, the workers should be able to make all the decisions that affect them themselves.
Rudolf Rocker was one of the most popular voices in the anarcho-syndicalist movement. He outlined a view of the origins of the movement, what it sought, and why it was important to the future of labor in his 1938 pamphlet ''Anarcho-Syndicalism''.
The
International Workers Association is an international anarcho-syndicalist federation of various labor unions from different countries. The
Spain Spanish Confederación Nacional del Trabajo played and still plays a major role in the Spanish
labor movement. It was also an important force in the
Spanish Civil War.
Mutualism
{{Main|mutualism (economic theory)}}
Image:Proudhon-children.jpg Gustave Courbet.html" title="Meaning of 300px 300px|right|thumb|Proudhon and his children, by [[Gustave Courbet, 1865.html" title="Meaning of right|thumb|Proudhon and his children, by [[Gustave Courbet">300px|right|thumb|Proudhon and his children, by [[Gustave Courbet, 1865">right|thumb|Proudhon and his children, by [[Gustave Courbet">300px|right|thumb|Proudhon and his children, by [[Gustave Courbet, 1865
While still socialist, mutualism is the most
individualism individualist branch of libertarian socialism. [http://www.progress.org/2003/libsoc01.htm]
Pierre Joseph Proudhon,
William B. Greene,
Benjamin Tucker, and
John Gray used the term to describe their economic theories. While rejecting private property when it is obtained through violation of the labor theory of value, mutualists tend to believe people have a right to not only possess but own private property as long as it is the product of their own labor. Mutualists do, however, stand against profit and believe that nothing should be sold for more than its "true cost".
To accomplish this, they believe in a system where money is replaced with labor notes that denote a given amount of labor. Whether amount of labor coincides only to hours worked or includes intensity and sacrifice is a point of contention. Wherever a great number of workers is needed, an association of workers is expected. However, the labor of a lone worker requires no association. They also advocate mutual banks, owned by the workers, that do not charge interest. Most mutualists believe that anarchy should be achieved gradually through superiority in the marketplace rather than through revolution.
Worker cooperatives such as the
Mondragón Cooperative Corporation follow an economic model similar to that of mutualism. The model followed by the corporation
WL Gore and Associates, inventor of
Gore-Tex fabrics, is also similar to mutualism as there is no chain of command and salaries are determined collectively by the workers. It is important to note that Gore and Associates has never identified itself as anarchist.
Mutualism's stress on worker association is similar to the more developed modern theory of
Participatory Economics, although Participatory Economists do not believe in markets.
Council communism
{{Main|Council Communism}}
'''Council communism''' was a radical
left-wing politics Left movement originating in
Germany and the
Netherlands in the 1920s. Its primary organization was the
Communist Workers Party of Germany (KAPD). Council communism continues today as a theoretical and
activist position within
Marxism, and also within libertarian socialism. The central argument of council communism, in contrast to those of
Social democracy and
Leninism Leninist communism, is that
workers' councils arising in the factories and municipalities are the natural form of
working class organisation and state power. This view is opposed to the
reformist and
Bolshevik stress on
Vanguard party vanguard parties,
parliaments, or
governments.
The core principle of council communism is that the state and the economy should be managed by
workers' councils, composed of delegates elected at workplaces and recallable at any moment. As such, council communists oppose state-run "bureaucratic socialism". They also oppose the idea of a "revolutionary party", since council communists believe that a revolution led by a party will necessarily produce a party
dictatorship. Council communists support a workers' democracy, which they want to produce through a federation of workers' councils.
The
Russian language Russian word for council is "
Soviet (council) soviet," and during the early years of the revolution worker's councils were politically significant in
Russia. It was to take advantage of the
aura of workplace power that the word became used by
Lenin for various political organs. Indeed, the name "
Supreme Soviet," by which the parliament was called; and that of the
Soviet Union itself make use of this terminology, but they do not imply any
decentralization.
Furthermore, council communists held a critique of the
Soviet Union as a
capitalist state, believing that the
Bolshevik revolution in Russia became a "
bourgeois revolution" when a party bureaucracy replaced the old
feudal aristocracy. Although most felt the
October Revolution Russian Revolution was working class in character, they believed that, since capitalist relations still existed (because the workers had no say in running the economy), the Soviet Union ended up as a
state capitalist country, with the state replacing the individual capitalist. Thus, council communists support workers' revolutions, but oppose one-party dictatorships.
Council communists also believed in diminishing the role of the party to one of agitation and
propaganda, rejected all participation in
elections or parliament, and argued that workers should leave the reactionary trade unions and form one big revolutionary union.
Social Ecology
{{Main|Social Ecology}}
Social Ecology is closely related to the work and ideas of
Murray Bookchin and influenced by anarchist
Peter Kropotkin. Social ecologists assert that the present
ecological crisis has roots in social problems, and that the domination of human over nature is a result of the domination of human over human.
Politically, social ecologists advocate a network of directly democratic citizens' assemblies organized in a confederal fashion. This approach is called
Libertarian Municipalism.
Economically, social ecologists favour
libertarian communism and the principle "from each according to ability, to each according to need."
The
Institute for Social Ecology founded in 1974 in
Plainfield, Vermont Plainfield,
Vermont offers a year-round B.A. and M.A. degree program, workshops, and academic conferences.
Violence in anarchism
Image:Food Not Bombs logo.png right|130px|thumb|Food Not Bombs Logo
Many libertarian socialists see violent revolution as necessary in the abolition of capitalist society. Along with many others,
Errico Malatesta argued that the use of violence was necessary; as he put it in ''
Umanità Nova'' (no. 125, September 6, 1921):
:''It is our aspiration and our aim that everyone should become socially conscious and effective; but to achieve this end, it is necessary to provide all with the means of life and for development, and it is therefore necessary to destroy with violence, since one cannot do otherwise, the violence which denies these means to the workers.'' [http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/anarchists/malatesta/rev_haste.html]
However, Proudhon, who people often term "the father of anarchism," argued in favor of a
Non-violent revolution. The progression towards violence in anarchism stemmed, in part, from the various massacres of the communes that has sprung from Proudhon's own ideas. Anarcho-communists began to see a need for revolutionary violence as a form of collective defense against the involuntary restrictions upheld by property owners.
The non-violent anarchist movement today consists of organizations such as BAAM,
Food Not Bombs, or Anarchist Black Cross.
Criticisms of libertarian socialism
A common criticism, made by non-socialist
libertarians, is that a free market will spontaneously arise (given modern populations) unless it is suppressed by force (with the exception of a market in information intangibles such as software, music, films, and literature, which requires active enforcement of
intellectual property laws to keep from turning into a pure
gift economy). Typically, non-socialist libertarians believe that a capitalist economy is natural, rather than artificial, so it would naturally develop in the absence of regulating factors. Thus they argue that a truly ''socialist'' libertarianism would be an
oxymoron. However, cultural anthropologists have long noted that capitalism defined by private ownership and control of production and self-regulating markets for land, labour and capital is a relatively recent phenomenon in human history, implying that societies can exist and prosper without these attributes. Libertarian socialists also claim that the mere existence of markets in antiquity for consumer goods, or the institution of money, does not denote capitalist social relations, nor can they necessarily be regarded as its incipient forms. For example, in their historical work on the institution of money, Fikret Adaman and Pat Devine conclude that "historically money predates (market) exchange and should be seen fundamentally as a means of payment in discharge of a social obligation", in other words it was embedded in social norms rather than being regulated by an autonomous market mechanism. [http://www.web.net/blackrosebooks/economy.htm]
Libertarian socialists in conjunction with Marxists dispute the notion that capitalist economic relations arise spontaneously in the absence of suppression, but in fact require active political suppression in the form of
property law that is enforced either by a state or by private force (see:
Property is theft). Karl Polanyi argued in his seminal work, ''The
Great Transformation'' (1944), that while markets existed for consumer goods they were invariably embedded in social norms, whereas as self-regulating markets for labour, land and money came about only as the result of the violent intervention by the state. The first instance of this violent displacement of traditional societies occurred in England with the
enclosures of common land from the 15th to 18th centuries. This state-led experiment of imposing the "stark utopia" of the self-regulating market wherein the guiding motives of individuals in society are reduced to "hope of gain" and "fear of hunger" has been repeated many times since, throughout the globe, at what socialists claim is an enormous human and environmental cost, including the virtual extinction of ethnic cultures (e.g.,
Colonialism). It has also been a process that has elicited oppositional struggles whose thrust has been to re-embed the market in social norms that protect the human and natural substance of society.
Libertarian socialists instead argue that a socialist society can develop and endure without coercion.
Anarcho-syndicalists believe that
trade unionism,
direct action, and mass organisation among free individuals would negate capitalism which, similarly, can only be saved by coercion. There are few, if any, libertarian socialists who think that violence should play an institutional role in a future society. Some anarchists, who have been called
anarcho-pacifism anarcho-pacifists, reject violence altogether. Thus, they claim that it is a
straw-man to suggest that libertarian socialists would violently restrict voluntary economic relations between individuals in the absence of a state. Rather, they believe that capitalist economic relations require public or private enforcement ''because'' they are involuntary themselves, thus resistance against private property enforcement is a form of defense.
Adherents of the
Austrian School of
economics argue that the distinction between "personal" and "productive"
property is specious, and that consequently paradoxes in their division are doomed to arise regardless of the delineation chosen. Libertarian socialists generally disagree that the division is specious, but agree that it in some circumstances it can be a subject of contention; thus the decision cannot be trusted to executive decisions of bureaucrats (as state socialists propose), but insofar as it is a public concern, it can be expected to be resolved in the participatory democratic body appropriate to the circumstances. Others believe that the distinction they make is not between personal and productive property, but rather between property that is "in use" or part of a broader use pattern and property that is "out of use" or used to extort labor from a second party.
Some argue that
freedom and
equality are often in conflict with one another, and that promoting equality (as valued by socialism) will inherently require restrictions on liberty (as valued by libertarianism), forcing the society to choose one or the other as their primary value. (The
Kurt Vonnegut story, "
Harrison Bergeron", in which equality is enforced by imposing physical and mental handicaps on overachievers, can be seen as a ''reductio ad absurdum'' argument illustrating this point.) Yet it is perhaps telling that those who follow Vonnegut's line of argument do not provide examples of egalitarians who actually hold the views that they are attacking. Radical egalitarians such as
Noam Chomsky note that, "human talents vary considerably, within a fixed framework that is characteristic of the species and that permits ample scope for creative work, including the appreciation of the creative achievements of others. This should be a matter of delight rather than a condition to be abhorred." (Chomsky Reader, 199) The thrust of the work of another egalitarian, Karl Marx, was never to make human beings identical, but "the development of rich individuality which is as all-sided in its production as in its consumption", and "the absolute working out of (his) creative potentalities." [http://www.dougdowd.org/NewFiles/articles/lebowitzhi.html] Libertarian socialists believe that the right-libertarian conception of freedom often amounts to little more than apologetics for the right of the powerful to do as they please often at the expense of the freedoms of the less powerful. As libertarian socialist
Robin Hahnel has explained,
:[I]t is, of course, a good thing for people to be free to do what they please- as long as what they choose does not impinge on more important freedoms or rights of others...I should not be free to employ you because my freedom of enterprise robs you of a more fundamental freedom to manage your own labouring capacities. I should not be free to bequeath substantial inheritance to my children because that robs the children of less wealthy parents of their more fundamental right to an equal opportunity in life. Although advocates of capitalism would not agree, there is little disagreement about any of this among those who believe we must go beyond capitalism if we are to achieve the economics of equitable cooperation. But are there additional freedoms and rights that others should not be free to violate in choosing to do what they please?...We think self-management is the only way to interpret what "economic freedom" means without having one person's freedom conflict with freedoms of others.(p.289)...I define self-management as decision making input in proportion to the degree one is affected.(p.40)(Hahnel- The ABC's of Political Economy)[http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=26&ItemID=7529]
Historical origins
Pre-'anarchism' libertarians
Although anarchism is generally considered to be a development in
Western world Western philosophical and political thought, some would disagree. Rejection of coercive authority can be traced as far back as
Ancient China, where
Taoism is declared by some to have been the oldest example of anarchist doctrine[http://www.tao.ca/thinking/texts/taoanarch.html]. In fact, similar rejections of authority can probably be found in every society, if one looks hard enough; whether or not they are anarchist is a question for debate.
Anarcho-primitivism Anarcho-primitivists assert that for the longest period of
human history, human society was organised on anarchist principles. This is often framed as a conflict between
Dominator culture dominator cultures and archaic partnership cultures. However their critics claim that such a projection of their abstract principles is simply an adaptation of the mainstream project of western value systems onto the rest of the world.
In the
Western world, an anti-authoritarian tendency can be traced to
Ancient Greece, with philosophers like
Zeno of Citium, the founder of the
Stoic philosophy, who was, according to
Peter Kropotkin, "[t]he best exponent of anarchist philosophy in ancient Greece". Zeno distinctly opposed his vision of a free community without government to the state-
Utopia utopia of
Plato. "He repudiated the omnipotence of the state, its intervention and regimentation, and proclaimed the sovereignty of the moral law of the individual." Zeno argued that although the necessary instinct of
Self preservation self-preservation leads humans to
egotism, nature has supplied a corrective to it by providing man with another instinct—sociability. Like many modern anarchists, he believed that if people follow their instincts, they will have no need of law-courts or police, no temples and no public worship, and use no money (free gifts taking the place of the exchanges). Zeno's beliefs, however, have only reached us as fragmentary quotations.[http://www.blackcrayon.com/page.jsp/library/britt1910.html]
There were also movements such as the
Free Spirit in the
Middle Ages and the
Diggers (True Levellers) during the
English Civil War.
In fact, some anarchists assert anarchism is not so much a movement as an historical tendency; indeed, Bakunin saw thought and rebellion as the principal tenets of
human nature as well as of anarchism. Modern anarchists like Murray Bookchin also contend that there are libertarian and authoritarian tendencies throughout history. Others, like
George Woodcock reject these claims as an unnecessary attempt to lay down an anarchist
creation story. However, there was certainly no coherent ideology that called itself 'anarchism' until the
19th century nineteenth century, when anarchism — then often referred to simply as 'revolutionary socialism' — emerged as the libertarian side of the growing
socialism socialist and
communism communist movements of that period.
Image:PeterKropotkin.jpg thumb|left|Peter Kropotkin
''Anarchism'': a new word
Most of the labor movements of the time were fiercely
anti-capitalism anti-capitalist, and the resulting organisations produced many
utopian visions for how they wished to transform society. Anarchism developed and flourished in this environment, and had a profound mutual relationship with labor movements until well into the 20th century.
Mikhail Bakunin, a Russian philosopher and the intellectual heir of
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Pierre Joseph Proudhon (who adopted the term ''anarchist'' in its modern political meaning) was the first major proponent of the philosophy of libertarian socialism. Bakunin summarized the philosophy: "We are convinced that freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin's conflict with Marx (discussed above under "
Libertarian socialism#Conflict with Marxism Conflict with Marxism") was the most visible and well-known split between "authoritarians" and "libertarians" to take place in the nineteenth century
working class movement.
The next major step in the development of libertarian socialism came with
Peter Kropotkin, a Russian scientist who developed the philosophy of anarchist communism. His writings included ''
The Conquest of Bread'' and ''
Fields, Factories and Workshops''. Kropotkin gave up his nobility and refused the offered position of secretary of an important geographical society on moral grounds. He traveled across the world, using his training as a
geographer to catalog
productivity, and concluded that an admirable lifestyle could be achieved for all with only five hours of work per day for part of your adult life. He also elaborated an idea called
mutual aid, which he believed humans were naturally driven towards.
The spread of ideas: anarchism's influence
Since the 19th century, anarchist ideas have spread through the labor movement, and influenced many radicals and revolutions.
In the
Russian Revolution of 1917 Russian Revolution, after the overthrow of the tsarist state, many revolutionary movements sprang up all throughout the collapsing Russian Empire. Notable amongst these was an anarchist peasant movement in
Ukraine, usually known as the Makhnovists due to the influence of
Nestor Makhno, an anarchist peasant/general. The Makhnovists organized resistance against the White counter-revolution, and later on against the consolidation of power by the
Bolsheviks, but were eventually crushed.
Mexican Revolution — The revolutionary period in
Mexico was an extended period usually considered to have begun with the overthrow of the dictator
Porfirio DÃaz and the installation of the moderate
Francisco I. Madero. Instrumental in this transfer of power were the likes of
Pancho Villa and
Emiliano Zapata, a
mestizo peasant from the state of
Morelos. Zapata and his followers, the ''Zapatistas'', mostly
Indigenous peoples of the Americas Native American, advocated a program of radical land reform under the slogan ''Tierra y Libertad'', or "Land and Liberty". This demand, laid out roughly in the Zapatistas' ''
Plan de Ayala'', sought to break up the large landholdings (''fincas'') which maintained power in the hands of the landlords (''finqueros'') and kept the indigenous peasants chained into a system of lifelong debt slavery (''
peonaje''). This Zapatista movement was eventually augmented by intellectuals from
Mexico City, including the anarchist
Antonio DÃaz Soto y Gama and the brothers Jesús and
Ricardo Flores Magón (who coined the phrase "Land and Liberty" that Zapata adopted). These intellectuals, more articulate than the illiterate peasants (probably including Zapata himself), became the voice for the Zapatista movement. Zapata quickly broke with Madero, who he felt was not moving quickly enough in the area of land reform, and continued to fight his government and the successive governments of
Victoriano Huerta and
Venustiano Carranza. Madero, Huerta, and Carranza fought each other for control of the Mexican state, but all agreed that Zapata was a thorn that had to be removed. Eventually, after many years of fighting, Carranza succeeded in having Zapata assassinated (on
April 10,
1919), and subduing the Zapatista forces.
Image:Anarchism in Spain Fascism Snake.jpg Confederación Nacional del Trabajo right|framed|A [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT poster from the
Spanish Civil War.html" title="Meaning of CNT.html" title="Meaning of right|framed|A [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT">right|framed|A [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT poster from the
Spanish Civil War">CNT.html" title="Meaning of right|framed|A [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT">right|framed|A [[Confederación Nacional del Trabajo|CNT poster from the
Spanish Civil War
Especially significant in the worldwide anarchist movement was the
Anarchism in Spain anarchist activity in Spain, which reached a peak during the
Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) and resulted from many decades of anarchist agitation and education. The vibrant and widespread support for anarchism resulted in a social revolution that occurred alongside the fight against fascist forces. During the civil war, the anti-
fascism fascist forces were comprised of various factions including communists and anarchists. Anarchist groups controlled both territory and factories for a time during the war, especially in
Catalonia. Fights broke out between the communists and anarchists in some cities, culminating in the
Barcelona May Days of 1937. One of the major anarchist groups from that time, the
Confederación Nacional del Trabajo CNT (Confederación National del Trabajo), still exists in Spain (see [http://www.cnt.es/]). Though the fascists won and the anarchists came into conflict with the fascist rebels, liberal democrats and authoritarian communists, many fled overseas (especially to France) and helped bring anarchist ideas to labor movements around the world.
Labour organisations such as the CNT have often been the focal point of anarchist activity. The
Industrial Workers of the World (IWW, or 'Wobblies') are a libertarian socialist labor union that was prominent in labor struggles in the United States during the early 20th century. They advocate the formation of "one big union" comprised of all workers everywhere. The IWW made use of militant tactics in order to effect their demands for improvement in worker's conditions, including sabotage, and popularized the '
wildcat strike', a sudden, unannounced work stoppage, as a means of fighting. While they never advocated straight out violence, they were clear in their intent to defend themselves if attacked, and fought back with force against policemen and
Pinkerton National Detective Agency Pinkerton security guards. The Wobblies were openly revolutionary (as many labor unions were at the time) and saw their struggle for worker's rights only as a tool towards the eventual worker takeover of factories that the syndicalists envisioned at the time. They were racially inclusive, recognizing that black workers and white workers faced the same oppression (in a time when many labor unions were exclusive). They faced fierce resistance, both from the bosses themselves and from the federal government, particularly during the time of the
Palmer Raids. This resistance, and the slow process of attrition of revolutionary potential as labor unions forced concessions from the capitalists, reduced the IWW to tatters by the early twenties. They still survive in some form and are organizing workers to this day (see [http://www.iww.org/ IWW.org]).
Anarchism today
Despite the fact that several mass-based popular anarchist organizations were dismantled before, during, or after the first two World Wars by fascist or communist dictatorships (e.g. in
Spain, the
Soviet Union,
Italy,
Germany,
Cuba), thus leading anarchist historian
George Woodcock to conclude that the movement was dead in the early 1960s (a claim he would later retract), anarchism enjoyed a major resurgence in the late 1960s in the wave of popular protest against the
Vietnam War and with new social movements like
feminism, the
civil rights movement, the
ecology movement, and "third world" solidarity movements. Anarchism, as a living political praxis, has been informed by the insights of such movements throughout its history. Although the anarchist movement today is not as large numerically as it was 70 or 80 years ago, it is arguably much more international.
Today, the most visible element of the anarchist movement is in the protests surrounding the various summits of international financial organizations like the
WTO and the
G-8 and in the so-called
anti-globalization movement. This, however, is far from a complete picture of contemporary anarchist activity.
Image:Flag of the EZLN.svg thumb|left|The flag of the modern Zapatista uprising.
The Zapatista uprising in
Chiapas,
Mexico in 1994 gave the
non-parliamentary left new momentum and vigour. As the first major leftist uprising after the fall of the Soviet Union, the Zapatista ethic of not taking state power, rather, exercising power within their own communities through popular directly democratic assemblies mirrored traditional anarchist demands of decentralized political power and participatory decision-making structures. The Zapatista uprising would influence global movements such as
Peoples' Global Action and
Indymedia, as well as numerous social movements in Latin America, leaving a strong left libertarian imprint on popular struggles throughout the world.
While the anarchist movement lost much of it's influence on the labour movment by the late 1930s, many anarchist labour unions continue to organize and grow. Notable examples include the Spanish
Confederacion General del Trabajo de España and
Confederación Nacional del Trabajo, the
Industrial Workers of the World, the Swedish
Sveriges Arbetares Centralorganisation, the
France French Confédération nationale du travail, the Siberian Confederation of Labour
SKT, and the Italian
CIB Unicobas. United with a growing international
platformism platformist tendency, many anarchist unions form the backbone of
International Libertarian Solidarity.
Several social movements, although not explicitly anarchist, contain left libertarian elements both in their outlook and organizing principles, often working alongside, with direct participation, or endorsement from anarchists. These include, but are not limited to, the approximately 200
Argentinian self-managed factories and popular assemblies; the
Brazilian Landless Workers' Movement; and
indigenist struggles for land and liberty.
In addition, anarchists today are involved in the
squatter movement,
social centers, and
infoshops; anti-poverty groups like
OCAP and
Food Not Bombs;
tenants unions and
housing cooperatives;
anti-sexist organizing; grassroots media initiatives; digital media and computer activism; experiments in
participatory economics; anti-racist and anti-fascist groups like
Anti-Racist Action and
Antifa; organizations protecting the rights of immigrants and promoting the free movement of people like the
No Border Network and
No one is Illegal; while maintaining a long-established presence in various community groups,
worker co-operatives,
countercultural and artist groups, and the
peace movement.
Other prominent anarchists and libertarian socialists include:
*
Alan Albon (
Freedom newspaper ''Freedom'' newspaper,
Green Anarchist)
*
Murray Bookchin
*
Maurice Brinton
*
Cornelius Castoriadis
*
Noam Chomsky
*
Stuart Christie
*
Chumbawamba
*
Voltairine de Cleyre (1866–1912)
*
Crass (
punk rock band formed by an anarchist collective involved with the
Dial House community in
Essex, England Essex,
England)
*
Sam Dolgoff
*
Buenaventura Durruti
*
Takis Fotopoulos
*
William Godwin
*
Emma Goldman
*
Godspeed You! Black Emperor (
post-rock band formed in
Montreal,
Quebec,
Canada)
*
Paul Goodman
*
Libertarian Book Club The Libertarian Book Club
*
Kotoku Shusui (prominent
Japanese anarchist)
*
Albert Meltzer
*
Peter Neville
*
Lucy Parsons
*
Vernon Richards (
Freedom newspaper ''Freedom'' newspaper)
*
Rudolf Rocker
*
Victor Serge
*
Colin Ward (
Freedom newspaper ''Freedom'' newspaper)
*
Errico Malatesta
*
Howard Zinn
*
Leung Kwok-hung
Further reading
Books
*''Anarchism'',
George Woodcock (Penguin Books, 1962) (For many years the classic introduction, until in part superseded by Harper's 'Anarchy: A Graphic Guide')
*''Anarchy: A Graphic Guide'',
Clifford Harper (Camden Press, 1987) (An excellent overview, updating Woodcock's classic, and beautifully illustrated throughout by Harper's woodcut-style artwork)
*''The Anarchist Reader'', George Woodcock (Ed.) (Fontana/Collins 1977) (An anthology of writings from anarchist thinkers and activists including
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Proudhon,
Peter Kropotkin Kropotkin,
Mikhail Bakunin Bakunin,
Murray Bookchin Bookchin,
Emma Goldman Goldman, and many others.)
*''
The Dispossessed'',
Ursula K. Le Guin (a 1974
science fiction novel that takes place on a planet with an anarchist society; winner of both the
Hugo Award Hugo and
Nebula Awards for best novel.)
*''Libertarianism without Inequality'', by Michael Otsuka, (Oxford University Press 2003)
Periodicals
*''
The Northeastern Anarchist (Publication of the North Eastern Federation of Anarchist Communists
NEFAC)'' (
United States US)
*''
Anarcho-Syndicalist Review'' (
United States US)
*''
Freedom newspaper Freedom'' (
United Kingdom UK)
*''
The Raven (journal) The Raven'' (
United Kingdom UK)
*''
Red & Black Revolution (Publication of The
Workers Solidarity Movement)'' (
Ireland IE)
*''
Workers Solidarity (Publication of the
Workers Solidarity Movement)'' (
Ireland IE)
*''
Black Flag (newspaper) Black Flag (Publication of the
Anarchist Black Cross)'' (
United Kingdom UK)
*''
The Match journal The Match'' (
United States US)
*''
Perspectives on Anarchist Theory'' (
United States US)
See also
*
Anarcho-punk
*
Anarcho-syndicalism#Anarcho-syndicalism Anarcho-syndicalism
*
Anarchist Black Cross
*
Anarchism in Spain
*
Alternative society
*
Christian anarchism Christian libertarianism
*
Geolibertarianism
*
Georgism
*
Left communism
*
Libertarian League: a libertarian socialist organisation in New York and other American cities in the fifties and sixties.
*
Parecon
*
Past and present anarchist communities#Radicalism in Grenada.2C 1979 to 1983 Radicalism in Grenada 1979 to 1983
''Contrast'':
Libertarianism,
Hierarchical organization
External links
-
An Anarchist FAQ—Provides useful information on the theory and history of anarchism
-
"Anarchism", from The Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1910.
-
The History of Anarchism by Brian Crabtree (1992)
-
Anarchist History—Anarchist Archives
*The [http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/gallery/galleryindex.htm Anarchist Encyclopedia] list several hundred anarchists
*The [http://recollectionbooks.com/bleed/indexTimeline.htm Anarchist Timeline] lists 2500+ dates with events & resource links
-
Infoshop.org is an anarchist newswire and information service
-
libcom.org the home of Libertarian Communism in Britain
-
The self-described Libertarian Communist Home Page
-
A-Infos Anarchist News Service
-
Anarchist Archives
-
Collective Action Notes is a libertarian socialist publication whose website hosts an extensive collection of online anti-authoritarian texts.
-
Franz Kafka and Libertarian Socialism by Michael Löwy
-
Industrial Workers of the World
-
Smygo News & Views for Anarchists & Activists.
Category:Anarchism
Category:Communism
Category:Political movements
Category:Socialism
Category:Political theories
de:Libertarismus
es: Socialismo libertario
fi:Libertaari sosialismi
fr:Anarchisme socialiste
nl:Libertarisch socialisme
ru:Либертарный Ñ?оциализм
see
Libertarian socialism
*** Shopping-Tip: Libertarian Socialism
