Dictionary of Meaning
<<Back
Please select a letter:
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z |
0-9
Click here for Shopping
Ricardian Equivalence
*** Shopping-Tip: Ricardian Equivalence
'''Ricardian equivalence''', or the ''Barro-Ricardo equivalence proposition'', is an
economic theory which suggests that government budget deficits do not affect the total level of demand in an economy. It was proposed by the 19th century economist
David Ricardo.
In simple terms, the theory can be described as follows. Governments may either finance their spending by taxing current taxpayers, or they may borrow money. However, they must eventually repay this borrowing by raising taxes above what they would otherwise have been in future. The choice is therefore between "tax now" and "tax later".
Suppose that the government finances some extra spending through deficits - i.e. tax later. Ricardo argued that although taxpayers would have more money now, they would realise that they would have to pay higher tax in future and therefore save the extra money in order to pay the future tax. The extra saving by consumers would exactly offset the extra spending by government, so overall demand would remain unchanged.
More recently, economists such as
Robert Barro have developed more sophisticated variations on the same idea, particularly using the theory of
rational expectations.
Ricardian Equivalence suggests that government attempts to influence demand using
fiscal policy will prove fruitless. It can be contrasted with alternative theories in
Keynesian economics. In Keynesian models, a
multiplier (economics) multiplier effect means that fiscal policy, far from being impotent, has a geared effect on demand, with a one pound increase in deficit spending increasing demand by more than one pound.
Assumptions of Ricardian Equivalence
Ricardian equivalence states that the level of government deficit does not affect the level of consumption. This is because people know that their taxes will have to rise in future to pay off the deficit, and so they save money now to pay off the future taxes.
To work, this needs several conditions, most commonly:
*A '''perfect capital market''' where any household can borrow or save as much as is required.
*'''Intergenerational concern'''. The tax rise required may not occur for centuries, and will be paid off by the great-great-grandchildren of the population around at the time the debt was incurred. Ricardian equivalence only happens when the current generation has some concern for all future generations, even if not perfect concern. Barro phrased this as "any operative intergenerational transfer".
These assumptions are widely challenged. The perfect capital market hypothesis is often held up for particular criticism because of the existence of
liquidity constraints which invalidate the
lifetime income hypothesis which it is based on. The existence of international capital markets also complicates the picture.
However, the underlying intuition of the Barro-Ricardo model is that individual action can unravel Government policy, that the economy does not act in a mechanistic manner, and that policies can have unintended consequences. This is a key point of modern macroeconomic policy..
External links
-
Does It Matter How You Pay for a State Dinner? A Lesson on Ricardian Equivalence by Morgan Rose, at the Library of Economics and Liberty
-
Biography of David Ricardo
Category:Economics
de:Ricardianische Äquivalenz
es:Equivalencia ricardiana
see
Ricardian equivalence
*** Shopping-Tip: Ricardian Equivalence