Dictionary of Meaning

<<Back
Please select a letter:
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | 0-9

Coquaternion

*** Shopping-Tip: Coquaternion
In abstract algebra, a '''coquaternion''' is an idea put forward by James Cockle in 1849. Like the 1843 quaternions of William Rowan Hamilton Hamilton, they form a four dimensional real vector space equipped with a multiplicative operation. Unlike the quaternion algebra, coquaternions may be zero divisors or nilpotent. The set { 1, i, j, k } forms a basis (linear algebra) basis. The coquaternion products of these elements are : i j = k = −j i, j k = − i = − k j, k i = j = − i k : i² = − 1, j² = + 1, k² = + 1 . With these products the set {1, i, j, k, -1, -i, -j, -k} is isomorphic to the dihedral group of a square. A '''coquaternion''' :q = w + x i + y j + z k has ''conjugate'' :q* = w − x i − y j − z k and ''modulus'' :q q* = w² + x² − y² − z². When the modulus is non-zero, then q has a multiplicative inverse. :U = {q : q q* ≠ 0 } is the set of unit (ring theory) units. The set '''P''' of all coquaternions forms a ring theory ring ('''P''', +, •) with group (mathematics) group of units (U, •). Let :q = w + x i + y j + z k, u = w + x i, v = y + z i where u and v are ordinary complex numbers. Then the complex matrix :

\begin{pmatrix}u & v \\v^* & u^* \end{pmatrix},

where u* = w − x i and v* = y − z i (complex conjugates of u and v), linear representation represents q in the ring of matrices in the sense that multiplication of coquaternions behaves the same way as the matrix multiplication. For example, the determinant of this matrix u u* − v v* = q q* ; the appearance of this minus sign where there is a plus in '''H''' leads to the alternative name '''split-quaternion''' for a coquaternion. Historically coquaternions preceded Arthur Cayley Cayley's matrix algebra; coquaternions (along with quaternions and tessarines) evoked the broader linear algebra.

Profile
Let :r(θ) = j cos θ + k sin θ (here θ is as fundamental as azimuth) : p(a,r) = i sinh a + r cosh a : v(a,r) = i cosh a + r sinh a : E = { r ∈ '''P''' : r = r(θ), 0 ≤ θ < 2 π } : J = {p(a,r) ∈ '''P''' : a ∈ '''R''', r ∈ E } catenoid : I = {v(a,r) ∈ '''P''' : a ∈ '''R''', r ∈ E } hyperboloid of two sheets Now it is easy to verify that :{q ∈ '''P''' : q² = + 1 } = J ∪ {1,-1} and that : {q ∈ '''P''' : q² = -1 } = I . These set equalities mean that when p ∈ J then the plane :{ x + yp : x,y ∈ '''R''' } = D_p is a subring of '''P''' that is isomorphic to the plane of split-complex numbers just as when v is in I then {x + y v : x,y ∈ '''R''' } = C_v is a planar subring of '''P''' that is isomorphic to the ordinary complex plane '''C'''. Note that for every r ∈ E, (r + i)² = 0 = (r - i)² so that r + i and r - i are nilpotents. The plane N = {x + y(r + i) : x,y ∈ '''R'''} is a subring of '''P''' that is isomorphic to the dual numbers. Since every coquaternion must lie in a D_p, a C_v, or an N plane, these planes profile '''P'''. For example, the unit sphere : SU(1,1) = { q ∈ '''P''' : q q* = 1 } consists of the "unit circles" in the constituent planes of '''P'''. In D_p this is an hyperbola, in N the unit circle is a pair of parallel lines, while in C_v it is indeed a circle (though it appears elliptical due to v-stretching).

Pan-orthogonality
When coquaternion q = w + xi + yj + zk, then the ''real part'' of q is w.
Definition: For non-zero coquaternions q and t we write '''q ⊥ t''' when the real part of the product qt* is zero. * For every v ∈ I, if q,t ∈ C_v, then q ⊥ t means the Ray (geometry) rays from 0 to q and t are perpendicular. * For every p ∈ J, if q,t ∈ D_p, then q ⊥ t means these two points are hyperbolic-orthogonal. * For every r ∈ E and every a ∈ '''R''', p = p(a,r) and v = v(a,r) satisfy p ⊥ v . * If u is a unit in the coquaternion ring, then q ⊥ t implies qu ⊥ tu. **proof: (qu)(tu)* = (uu*)qt* follows from (tu)* = u*t*, a fact based on anti-commutativity of vectors.

Counter-sphere geometry
Take m = x + y i + z r where r = j cos θ + k sin θ. Fix theta (θ) and suppose :m m* = − 1 = x² + y² − z² . Since points on the counter-sphere must line on a counter-circle in some plane D_p ⊂ '''P''' , m can be written, for some p ∈ J :m = p exp(b p) = sinh b + p cosh b = sinh b + i sinh a cosh b + r cosh a cosh b . Let φ be the angle between the hyperbolas from r to p and m. This angle can be viewed, in the plane tangent to the counter-sphere at r , by projection : :tan φ = x/y = sinh b / (sinh a cosh b) = tanh b / sinh a . As b gets large, tanh b nears one. Then tan φ = 1/ sinh a . This appearance of the angle of parallelism in a meridian θ inclines one to expect to see the counter- sphere unfold as metric space S¹ × HP where HP is the hyperbolic plane.

Application to kinematics
By using the foundations given above, one can show that the mapping : q → u⁻¹ q u is an ordinary or hyperbolic rotation according as : u = exp(a v), p ∈ I or u = exp(a p), v ∈ J . These mappings are projectivities in the inversive ring geometry of coquaternions.The collection of these mappings bears some relation to the Lorentz group since it is also composed of ordinary and hyperbolic rotations.Among the peculiarities of this approach to relativistic kinematic is the anisotropic profile, say as compared to Hyperbolic quaternions. Reticence to use coquaternions for kinematic models may stem from the (2,2) Signature (mathematics) signature when spacetime is presumed to have signature (1,3) or (3,1).Neverless, a transparently relativistic kinematics appears when a point of the counter-sphere is used to represent an inertial frame of reference.Indeed, if t t* = −1 , then there is a p ∈ J such that t ∈ D_p , and an a ∈ R such that t = p exp(a p).The if u = exp(a p) and s = i r , the set {t, u, v, s } is a pan-orthogonal basis stemming from t, and the orthogonalities persist through applications of the ordinary or hyperbolic rotations.

Historical notes and references
The coquaternions were initially identified and named in the ''London-Edinburgh-Dublin Philosophical Magazine'', series 3, volume 35, pp.434,5 in 1849 by James Cockle under the title "On Systems of Algebra involving more than one Imaginary". At the 1900 '''P'''aris meeting of the International Congress of Mathematicians Alexander MacFarlane called the algebra the ''exspherical quaternion system'' as he described its profile. MacFarlane examined a differential element of the submanifold {q ∈ '''P''' : q q* = - 1 } (the counter-sphere). The sphere itself was considered in German by Hans Beck in 1910 (''Transactions of the American Mathematical Society'', v.28; e.g. the dihedral group appears on page 419.)In 1942 and 1947 there were two brief mentions of the coquaternion structure in the ''Annals of Mathematics'': *A.A. Albert "Quadratic Forms permitting Composition" '''43''':161-177 *V. Bargmann "Representations of the Lorentz Group" '''48''':568-640 . Category:abstract algebra Category:quaternions Category:hyperbolic geometry Category:special relativity

*** Shopping-Tip: Coquaternion